Can death be represented? How do we think and form aesthetic relationships with what defies representation? While few things can be said to be as certain than the fact that our lives will end, Sigmund Freud nonetheless famously observed that it is “impossible to imagine our own death; and whenever we attempt to do so we can perceive that we are in fact still present as spectators.”1 It’s a rather medieval observation – he even ends that same essay with an invocation of the medieval memento mori: si vis vitam, para mortem, that is, to endure life, prepare for death. For as central to our allegedly secular, allegedly scientific modernity as Freud’s observations about the unconscious have been, the comment gestures towards an understanding of life that is deeply structured by something that we can’t actually fully imagine or represent – however obsessively we may think around, or, as it may happen, be surrounded by it.
One central concern of this class, then, is to approach death as a question of form. What form of thought, of articulation, of living, or of expression is appropriate for orienting oneself towards death? Is it the task of literature, art, philosophy, and other forms of speculative thought to console us and prepare us for death? Or is there a deeper, less utilitarian, sense in which they can bring thought to its own limits of signification and representability without eliminating it?
Introductions, syllabus overview, resources
Readings:
Readings
Readings:
Readings
Essay exam due
Readings:
Optional
Readings:
Readings:
Readings: